Search for: "Thomas v. General Motors Corp" Results 81 - 100 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands… [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Neff and the aforementioned Thomas, as well as the Luzerne County case Wissinger v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 5:26 am
: Microsoft v i4i (IPKat) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Copyright When pirates become copyright cash cows (TorrentFreak) Can copyright save the newspaper industry? [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
India: Gene silencing: (Spicy IP), India: US Patent reform implications for Indian Pharma: (Spicy IP), India: Generic pharmaceutical industry in the spotlight: (International Law Office), India: Supreme Court refuses to stay a Gujarat High Court decision restraining Ranbaxy from airing its controversial ads directed against Paras Pharma's 'Moov' brand: (Spicy IP),India: Patents on ARV drugs could increase costs: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),US: Survey… [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Yet another decision in favor of allowing for the consolidation of post-Koken claims was issued by Judge Thomas Burke in Luzerne County. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
SC90866 (Mo.banc 2010).Article 3, §40(30) provides that “[t]he General Assembly shall not pass any local or special law…where a general law can be made applicable. [read post]