Search for: "Thomas v. Texas" Results 81 - 100 of 2,368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
Thomas converted her home into a house of horrors, including a maze. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Texas and the other states relied on the "independent state legislature" (ISL) theory that had been tentatively launched by Chief Justice Rehnquist in his concurrence (joined by Justices Scalia and Thomas) in Bush v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 1:31 pm by Amy Howe
First, Divine contended, as the Supreme Court made clear in its 2021 decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
IPSO 19756-23 Saunders v mirror.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19679-23 Saunders v walesonline.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement 18579-23 Reynolds v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediated 18539-23 Garnier v Tenbury Wells Advertiser, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigatio 17700-23… [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
An issue that came up during a terrific panel that I participated in last Thursday—organized by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project—was whether age-verification laws for social-media use infringed on a First Amendment right of either adults or minors to receive speech anonymously. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Browning, retired Justice of Texas’ Fifth Court of Appeals, Maryland attorney Domonique A. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]