Search for: "Tiffany Bounds" Results 41 - 60 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2012, 8:28 am by Dan
Two internet trademark infringement cases, Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The injunction enjoined the bank (not just the defendants) from transferring money from the accounts, but the bank asserted (correctly in my view—I reviewed this issue in the post on Tiffany) that it was not bound by the injunction. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:00 am by PunditMom
  That’s bound to have some value as a collector’s item! [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:40 am by Allison Tenenbaum
With over 700 trademarks registered with the Patent and Trademark Office, this high-end brand is bound to attract some knockoffs. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
(As an aside, I think that Tiffany overreaches when it asserts that the Banks, which are not parties, are bound by the injunction. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
(As an aside, I think that Tiffany overreaches when it asserts that the Banks, which are not parties, are bound by the injunction. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
(As an aside, I think that Tiffany overreaches when it asserts that the Banks, which are not parties, are bound by the injunction. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
(As an aside, I think that Tiffany overreaches when it asserts that the Banks, which are not parties, are bound by the injunction. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:15 pm by Michelle Lindo McCluer
    Defense ArgumentCaptain Tiffany Dewell presented the defense argument. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:43 am by SHG
In this case, the question of whether the district court abused its discretion is inexorably bound to the plausibility of its determination that Tiffany's statements were reliable. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Under the terms of the settlement, the property owners must use the building, bounded by Canal, Centre, and Walker Streets, for legitimate purposes. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
July 14, 2008), where the court held that Tiffany failed to establish that eBay was liable for contributory trademark infringement for its failure to stop the sale of infringing Tiffany products of which it was aware or should have been aware. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
' [21]  Tiffany accused eBay of being responsible for the sale and encouragement of counterfeit merchandise by suggesting that the items were genuine Tiffany jewelry. [22] If eBay falsely presented the knockoff items as real Tiffany jewelry, an unassuming consumer would be easily confused and mislead, leading to the continuation of the illegality of the act if a purchase resulted. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:42 pm
GOP 'Caving' on Trademark Lawsuit Threats Judge Doesn't Give Tiffany a Trademark Silver Spoon in eBay Flap ... [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:01 am
Instead, fully understand the meets and bounds of what you can say and speak to these. 2. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 10:36 am
  Same for that Gerber baby, as Seth at Quizlaw points out that while California may be "different", you have to go to the Sovereign Nation of Texas to appreciate ways to make Floridians look almost normal.The Queen of New York Bloggers, Nicole Black at Sui Generis points out that no lovely blue box is going to change the fact that Tiffany's efforts would be better spent defending its mark than suing eBay, but it has yet to adapt… [read post]