Search for: "Time Technology Ltd." Results 61 - 80 of 2,349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2020, 11:11 am by James Jeffries-Chung
Trials in the time of COVID-19 appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:34 pm by kgates
Pyrrho Investments Ltd v MWB Property Ltd [2016] EWHC 256 (Ch) On February 2, 2016 an English court approved the use of predictive coding for the first time. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Vikas Goel, a resident of Dubai, was the founder of eSys Technologies Pte Ltd., a computer equipment distributor organized under the laws of Sinagpore and doing business there. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
This time, Laetitia tells us a bit about non-conventional trade marks. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:48 am by Eric Schweibenz
On May 1, 2012, the California Institute of Technology (“Caltech”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 2:04 am by Mark Summerfield
A Full Bench of three judges of the Federal Court of Australia has overturned an earlier decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, and has ruled that extensions of patent term are not available for second and subsequent medical uses of pharmaceutical substances that are produced by recombinant DNA technology: Commissioner of Patents v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd [2017] FCAFC 129 (AbbVie). [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:07 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) L & R v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 649 (23 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Bayfine UK v HM Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 304 (23 March 2011) Baturina v Times Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 308 (23 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) National Westminster Bank Plc v Binney [2011] EWHC 694 (QB) (23 March 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) The Hedgehog Golf Company Ltd v Hauser [2011] EWHC 689 (Ch) (23… [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:00 am
This time state governments enacted legislation to control the retail prices of seeds but most have not interfered with the technology license fee charged by Monsanto to seed companies. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Click-To-Call Technologies, LP,  No. 18-916 (appellate jurisdiction over challenge to PTO’s finding of no time-bar under §315(b)). [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:32 am by Docket Navigator
This is because a 'key inquiry' in the reasonable royalty analysis 'is what it would have been worth to the [infringer], as it saw things at the time, to obtain the authority to use the patented technology, considering the benefits it would expect to receive from using the technology and the alternatives it might have pursued.'. . . [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:15 am by Robert Sachs
In Part I of this analysis, I discussed litigation trends before and after the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp Pty Ltd v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 10:01 pm by Cathy Siegner
GIC Group and its Beijing partner, Bric Global Agricultural Consultants Ltd. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 12:07 am
The IPKat has twice (first here, then here) mentioned the dispute between Marine Rescue Technologies Ltd and others and litigant in person Michael Burchill. [read post]
On March 6, 2020, President Trump issued an Executive Order (“EO”) instructing the Chinese company Beijing Shiji Information Technology Co., Ltd. [read post]