Search for: "Title Source, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 1,652
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
(To draw an analogy, when citing a more traditional resource such as a journal article, the article title would be found in the title of source field and the journal name would be found in the title of container field.) [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 4:29 pm
Job Title: Legal AssistantEmployer: Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications, Inc., Raleigh, NCYears of Paralegal Experience: 5Education/Degrees: B.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:23 pm
The song title does not explicitly mislead as to the source of the work; it does not, explicitly or otherwise, suggest that it was produced by Mattel. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:54 am by Stanley D. Baum
Principal Financial Group, Inc., No. 09-16664 (9th Cir. 2010), the plaintiff, Patricia Murray, is a "career agent" for the defendants, collectively called "Principal". [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:16 am by Chris Castle
Indirect Funding Direct Funding Total Funding not acknowledged 131 85 216 Funding acknowledged 29 94 113 150 179 329 Source:  Google Academics, Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 7:08 am by Margaret Grisdela
(c) Legal Expert Connections, Inc., 866-417-7025 www.legalexpertconnections.com [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:57 pm by Phil
Stuart Soffer, Director of Patent Strategy and Analysis at IPriori, Inc. and Non-Resident Fellow, Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society wrote to me this weekend to alert me to the publication of the above-titled book from Oxford University Press. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 8:34 am by Jesse M. Coleman and Brian Wadsworth
Real estate startup HouseCanary made headlines when it secured a $700 million judgment against Title Source, Inc., now known as Amrock, in a trade secrets misappropriation case. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 3:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Lionsgate Entertainment, Inc., No. 12-2928 (7th Cir. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 4:23 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Source: DNY59 / iStock / Getty Images Plus On June 15, the Court ruled that the language of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which covers employers with at least 15 employees, is broad enough that the law’s prohibition of discrimination based on sex includes sexual orientation and gender identity. [read post]