Search for: "Title Source, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 1,652
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2009, 3:48 am
In April of 2006, Plaintiff allegedly created an original work of art which it titled the "Shadow Fern" design. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 3:09 pm
The Court determined that “Maryland courts have long held, in a variety of contexts, that titling of a bank account and the right to withdraw from the account does not indicate ownership. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:59 am by WIMS
" Applicability of the Summit Decision to EPA Title V and NSR Source Determinations (Dec. 21, 2012), reprinted in Joint Appendix ("J.A. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:49 am by Betsy McKenzie
  ConsumerWatchdog.org filed a class action law suit, In re Google Inc. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:48 am by Rick St. Hilaire
CHL is a service of Red Arch Cultural Heritage Law & Policy Research, Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:15 am by Michael Posluns
The Crown’s chutzpah runs throughout the entire line of post-1982 Aboriginal rights cases from Guerin to the most recent decision, Manitoba Métis Federation Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:09 am by Neil Wilkof
Kappa Books, Inc ("the title of a single book cannot serve as a source identifier"); In re Cooper, ("A book title . . . identifies a specific literary work . . . and is not associated in the public mind with the publisher, printer or bookseller . . . . [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:40 am
Blue Calypso Inc. lodged a patent infringement action against LivingSocial Inc. on Friday accusing the online deal company of wrongly taking advantage of its patented technology for peer to peer advertising. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:40 am
Blue Calypso Inc. lodged a patent infringement action against LivingSocial Inc. on Friday accusing the online deal company of wrongly taking advantage of its patented technology for peer to peer advertising. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:40 am
Orange County - Blue Calypso Inc. lodged a patent infringement action against LivingSocial Inc. on Friday accusing the online deal company of wrongly taking advantage of its patented technology for peer-to-peer advertising. [read post]