Search for: "Tobacco Express, II, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2023, 7:20 am by Sasha Volokh
First, in Part II, I argue that erotic-expression taxes are indeed content-discriminatory and should be evaluated under strict scrutiny. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 504 F.Supp.2d 939, 947 (S.D.Cal.2007) (noting split of authority but finding that, with recent Proposition 64 reforms, the UCL now requires reliance); Anunziato v. eMachines, Inc., 402 F.Supp.2d 1133, 1137-39 (C.D.Cal.2005) (declining to read a reliance requirement into the UCL); In re Tobacco II Cases, 146 P.3d 1250 (2006) (granting petition for review on issue of whether UCL requires reliance); Def.'s Opp'n n. 5; Pl.'s Reply… [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 713 A.2d 381 (N.H.1998), a tobacco case where the plaintiff sought to impose absolute liability. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:32 am by Jon L. Gelman
Griffith (R-VA), transfers marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule II of the CSA. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
: Alcon Inc v Bausch & Lomb (Australia) Pty Ltd (ipwars) FCA: Infringing a registered design? [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
My UCLA School of Law students Aaron Boudaie, Eimile Nolan, and Simon Ruhland and I had filed an amicus brief, on behalf of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), PEN American Center, Inc. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Time, Inc., 68 F.3d 285 (9th Cir. 1995), upheld the dismissal of UCL and FAL claims, rejecting as unpersuasive the plaintiff’s argument that readers will read only the large print on a promotion document and “ignore the qualifying language in small print. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Murphy Oil USA, Inc. used a Special Master to determine fees since the attorneys were in disagreement. [read post]