Search for: "TopLine Investments"
Results 21 - 24
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
This excerpt from the introduction summarizes the FTC’s topline perspective: The evidence will show that, through these Bidding Agreements, 1-800 Contacts effectively shut down its significant rivals’ search advertising against 1-800 Contacts’ trademarks, blocking relevant, valuable advertising that would have been displayed to consumers absent these agreements. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:54 am
Human rights advocates and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have called on the Pentagon to improve how it handles civilian harm in war for the past 20 years. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
In the following guest post, the authors revisit the question of whether or not securities class action lawsuits against development-stage biotech companies are likelier to survive a motion to dismiss compared to securities suits against other kinds of companies. [read post]
