Search for: "Trade Associates Group, Ltd. v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 331
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am
The Supreme Court considered a number of decisions by the ECtHR, including Unite the Union v United Kingdom [2017] IRLR 438, in which it was held that member states have a wide margin of discretion in how they protect trade union freedom. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 2:32 pm
In Brittania-U Nigeria, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
State Attorney Generals Increase Scrutiny of Restrictive Covenants A group of 18 attorneys general filed comments with the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in July 2019 in advance of a series of hearings centered on changes to antitrust and consumer protection enforcement in the 21st century. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Ltd. - Vitamin C Bruce L. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
United States, 370 U. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 8:04 am
These issues are not limited to filings in the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 2:53 pm
(the “Debtor”) and certain of its affiliated entities[1] (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 2:53 pm
(the “Debtor”) and certain of its affiliated entities[1] (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:29 am
Group, Inc., 886 F.2d 490, 495 (2d Cir. 1989), another non-Rogers title v. title case). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Essentially Lord Neuberger had some sympathy with the approach but not enough to reverse a century of settled English law.South Africa: Caterham Car Sales & Coachworks Ltd v Birkin Cars (Pty) Ltd which is similar to ConAgra [43]Hong Kong: Ten-Ichi Co Ltd v Jancar Ltd which however is contradicted by a more recent decision of the Court of Final Appeal in In re Ping An Securities Ltd [44]Singapore: Several cases were discussed, but the… [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
Bing AI was more eccentric: Guardian News and Media Ltd & Ors, Re HM Treasury v Ahmed & Ors [2010] UKSC 1 Venables & Anor v News Group Papers Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC B18 (QB) Ronaldo v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 2710 (QB) Mosley v The United Kingdom (Application no.48009/08) Ferdinand v Mgn Ltd (Rev 2) [2011] EWHC 2454 (QB) It is perhaps difficult to imagine that more… [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
BOYNTON-JCP ASSOCIATES, LTD., d/b/a BOYNTON BEACH MALL and SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., Appellee. 4th District.Child custody -- Time sharing -- Order modifying parenting plan to suspend mother's time-sharing during father's week to remedy her noncompliance with previous parenting plan is reversed because it fails to reflect that the change is temporary as the oral pronouncement held -- Remand for clarification that remedial custody arrangement is temporary -- Attorney's… [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:34 am
MARQUES, the Association of European Trade Mark Owners, has just prepared a Position Paper on Proposed Changes to the Locarno Classification System for Industrial Designs. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Duh. - ECJ ruling in Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v Simex Trading AG (IPKat) (Managing IP) Frisdranken/Red Bull dispute is referred to ECJ: Frisdranken Industrie Winters v Red Bull GmbH (Class 46) A serious reference or is somebody winding us up? [read post]
