Search for: "Trade Publishing Ltd"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2023, 9:22 am
For this reason, in its judgment of 25 July 2018 (case C-121/17 Teva UK Ltd and others v Gilead Sciences), it was inevitable that article 69 EPC and the protocol would slip into the judgment: “46. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
A reserved judgment is awaited in the fourth, Sobrinho v Impressa Publishing, heard on 7 to 9 December 2015 by Dingemans J. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:02 am
This Kat recently finished a report on press reporting and public perception of IP rights for the UK IPO [due to be published imminently!] [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Things to do with patent filing figuresThe European Patent Office publishes some patent data on which Katfriends at the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys have already pounced. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
CIGI has published a policy brief on the case for patents. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:09 am
As David Hart QC reported in this recent post, the Aarhus Compliance Committee sitting in Geneva recently published its draft decision that UK judicial review procedures were indeed prohibitively expensive and prevented access to justice. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:10 am
MARQUES CLASS 46 (Trade Marks)-- Representation of new types of trade marksRobert Guthrie, Chair of the MARQUES European Trade Mark Law and Practice Team, brings news of a Common Communication on the representation of new types of trade marks. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:22 pm
Thus, professional and trade associations should narrowly tailor their codes of ethics to focus only on obj [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:31 am
| Trade secrets in the US | European Copyright Society | Merpel in Eponia | Henry Hadaway Organisation v Pickwick Group Limited and Ors | CJEU activism on copyright | EU Commission unveils future copyright reform path | Music publishing and copyright | Dreaming of copyright, new eLAW event | Trade mark right exhaustion | VW trade mark disaster | Linking and copyright | elite media takes IP wrong. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:51 pm
A little late but no less welcome, the June 2007 issue of LexisNexis Butterworths' Intellectual Property and Technology Cases has now been published. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
In return, EIM agreed not to publish or license any other party to publish a magazine substantially similar to EDGE magazine under the name EDGE or under any colourably similar mark. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 7:53 am
Amendments to the Patent Rules, the Trade-marks Regulations, the Industrial Design Regulations, the Integrated Circuit Topography Regulations, and the Copyright Regulations were previously published in the Canada Gazette on May 16, 2007. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 3:58 am
Ltd. d/b/a NLS Group v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:26 pm
The IPKat's friend, IP blogger, commentator, practitioner and enthusiast Barbara Cookson (Filemot Technology Law Ltd) writes to draw his to attention to an unusual episode in the annals of the British Trade Mark Registry. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
Advocate General Bot’s Opinion in those cases has now been published, and this Jeremy’s post contains everything you need to know about it. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:46 am
Canadian Soiless Wholesale, Ltd, 2011 WL 2938483 (E.D. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:11 pm
Chamber of Commerce and bank trade associations. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:40 pm
"The decision is Realcomp II, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 7:47 am
Neither Terrapin v Builders Supply Co (Hayes) [1967] RPC 375 nor Cranleigh Precision Engineering Ltd v Bryant [1965] 1 WLR 1293 QBD was authority for that proposition [If Kats could blush, this one would be pretty pink -- he's sure he has persuaded a generation of students of the opposite, confident that Speed Seal Products Ltd v Paddington [1985] 1 WLR 1327 CA said this was the case];* There was strong authority for the proposition that publication of confidential information… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:32 pm
* F-word not descriptive of pharma product, rules courtJeremy comments on Flynn Pharma Ltd v Drugsrus Ltd and Tenolol Ltd [2015] EWHC 2759 (Ch), a 6 October 2015 decision of Mrs Justice Rose sitting in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, in another pharma parallel importation case which was bound to succeed against a spurious defence. [read post]
