Search for: "Trademark To Go"
Results 1 - 20
of 9,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2015, 6:36 am
Fluid trademarks – Go with the flow? [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:05 pm
The post Trademarks Make the World Go ‘RoundCan’t-Miss Program on Nuts and Bolts of Trademarks appeared first on Shades of Gray. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 6:01 am
Are trademark attorneys next to go extinct? [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
To continue reading, click: NBC Is Going After the ‘Dunder Mifflin’ Trademark… Again [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:57 am
You’ve started your business and things are going well. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 3:38 am
I could go on and on. [read post]
21 May 2021, 3:58 am
The post China Trademarks: Going After Bad Faith Squatters in Good Faith? [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:06 am
You can see this trend in trademark filings. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 2:22 pm
IPNews® – A couple of months after going to the Supreme Court in a trademark dispute, Jack Daniels is back in another one. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 9:21 am
If Trump does indeed want the trademark to create the network, his team will now have to go the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:36 am
A trademark infringement lawsuit goes after allegedly infringing use of a mark, while an opposition seeks to prevent registration of the mark from the get-go. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:00 pm
Trademark fraud claims aren’t going away, despite the fact that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) has not found fraud in a single trademark opposition or cancellation since the Federal Circuit decided In re Bose in 2009, rejecting the prior “knew or should have known” standard in favor of the much more difficult and heightened “specific intent to deceive” the USPTO standard. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:00 pm
Trademark fraud claims aren’t going away, despite the fact that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) has not found fraud in a single trademark opposition or cancellation since the Federal Circuit decided In re Bose in 2009, rejecting the prior “knew or should have known” standard in favor of the much more difficult and heightened “specific intent to deceive” the USPTO standard. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:52 pm
We’ve spilled a lot of digital ink discussing the trademark bullying topic, going all the way back to my original blog post from 2010: ”The Mark of a Real Trademark Bully. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 4:54 am
A day doesn’t go by without my GoogleAlert spotting another online reference to some purported example of “trademark bullying. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:58 am
Do you really think someone is going to register our trademark right away in China? [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:55 am
I’ll explain both and that’ll give you a clearer picture as where to go from here.First and foremost, a State trademark gives you trademark protection for that specific state whereas a Federal trademark gives you trademark protection nationwide. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:55 am
I’ll explain both and that’ll give you a clearer picture as where to go from here.First and foremost, a State trademark gives you trademark protection for that specific state whereas a Federal trademark gives you trademark protection nationwide. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:51 pm
There we were, all locked down in our houses and not going to the INTA Annual Meeting, and there was a Trademark Modernization Act! [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 11:51 am
After acquiring the Fort Wayne Rickers stores, Plaintiffs apparently became aware of Defendants’, Get 2 Go, Virk Brothers, LLC, and Charanjit Singh, use of the name and trademarks GET 2 GO in connection with three retail convenience stores in Fort Wayne (the “Infringing Marks”). [read post]
