Search for: "Transaction Holdings"
Results 61 - 80
of 15,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
The Court further held that, for a transaction to be eligible for business judgment (rather than entire fairness) review under MFW, the special committee must be entirely independent. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
The Court further held that, for a transaction to be eligible for business judgment (rather than entire fairness) review under MFW, the special committee must be entirely independent. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
On October 4, 2017, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued an order clarifying that it will not treat certain tax equity interests in public utilities or public utility holding companies as voting securities for purposes of transaction approval requirements pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”) (“Passive Interest Order”).[1] The Passive Interest Order provides guidance regarding FERC’s… [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:55 am
For the acquisition of public companies, the acquisition must result in the acquirer holding more than 20% of the voting shares of the target (more than 50% if more than 20% is already held). [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 2:05 pm
Continue reading → The post Concealment and Misrepresentation in Rhode Island Real Estate Transactions appeared first on Rhode Island Real Estate Lawyer Blog. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 1:50 pm
The same ratios would hold in New York, where proposals are more nascent but also much more aggressive. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
The post Holding an oil and gas licence: a privilege, not a right appeared first on Deal Law Wire. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:43 am
There is no warrant to place a restricted construction on clause (a) of sub-section(1) of Section 115 AD that only the income on account of holding the securities (like fruits from a tree) is covered by clause (a). [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:23 pm
Unfortunately, it seems that some institutions are attempting to minimize debit card and ATM-related fraud costs by rejecting disputes and improperly holding consumers responsible for losses A Tale of ATM Fraud In one recent case filed by SLG, the plaintiff discovered more than $3,000 in unauthorized ATM withdrawals and promptly reported those transactions to his financial institution, JP Morgan Chase Bank. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 7:22 am
This distortion would lead to investors holding certain assets longer than they should in order to avoid the tax. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 3:24 am
Further, there was no composite transaction involved in Sukanya Holdings, which is the case here. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 11:00 am
For any transaction with a U.S. target, the company will not represent or advise the U.S. target and will not receive, acquire or hold funds or securities. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:40 am
For private companies, the acquisition must result in the acquirer holding more than 35% of the voting shares of the target (more than 50% if more than 35% is already held). [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against six officers, directors, and major shareholders of public companies for failing to timely report information about their holdings and transactions in company stock. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:32 am
Press release Fatum Holdings N.V. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 3:32 pm
Ms Passer holds a JD (cum laude) from Cardozo School of Law and studied Soviet Law at the Columbia University School of Law. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 9:51 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court recently affirmed Vice Chancellor Laster’s much talked of AB Stable post-trial decision, holding that the buyer of a $5.8 billion hotel portfolio could terminate the transaction due to, among other things, the seller’s breach of an ordinary course covenant by making operational changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 5:55 pm
Terms of the transaction were not disclosed. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
On October 4, 2017, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued an order clarifying that it will not treat certain tax equity interests in public utilities or public utility holding companies as voting securities for purposes of transaction approval requirements pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”) (“Passive Interest Order”).[1] The Passive Interest Order provides guidance regarding FERC’s… [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
On October 4, 2017, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued an order clarifying that it will not treat certain tax equity interests in public utilities or public utility holding companies as voting securities for purposes of transaction approval requirements pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”) (“Passive Interest Order”).[1] The Passive Interest Order provides guidance regarding FERC’s… [read post]
