Search for: "U S Dept of Defense"
Results 61 - 80
of 227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
Markham’s defense that it was Mr. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:54 am
Forchelli & Forchelli 17 AD3d 343 (2 Dept 2005), citing Shopsin Siben Siben 268 AD2d 578 (2 Dept 2000); see also, Pechko Gendelman, 20 AD3d 404 (2 Dept 2005).. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 3:54 am
Fil em yr’ s representation, there would have been a more favorable outcome in the underlying action (see Dweck Law Firm, LLP v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [1st Dept 2001]). [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:21 pm
Page 1 2009 NY Slip Op 51545(U) MARIE F. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:30 am
Franc Perry illustrates how a claim of fraudulent concealment affects a statute of limitations defense. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:53 am
Since defendants did not conclusively refute plaintiff’s allegations, their motion to dismiss was properly denied (see Rite Aid of N.Y., Inc. v Chalfonte Realty Corp., 105 AD3d 470, 470-471 [1st Dept 2013]; Kirby McInerney & Squire, LLP v Hall Charne Burce & Olson, S.C., 15 AD3d 233 [1st Dept 2005]). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:06 am
"As a general rule, a party does not carry its burden in moving for summary judgment by pointing to gaps in its opponent's proof, but must affirmatively demonstrate the merit of its claim or defense. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
In Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
In Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:51 am
West 108’s statement of the law is correct. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:40 am
The Larsen Decision The first was Larsen v Larsen (2022 NY Slip Op 32415(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County July 18, 2022]), in which Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman considered and rejected a pre-answer dismissal challenge to a shareholder derivative suit based upon the suing minority shareholder’s alleged conflict of interest. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:49 am
An attorney for a limited liability company may have a fiduciary duty towards an individual member, at least with respect the member s share of distributions of the company's profits Kurtzman v Burgol 40 AD3d 588 (2d Dept 2007)). [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Gould, 39 AD3d 508, 509 [2d Dept 2007]). [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:08 am
Genesis Merchant Partners, LP v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 33130(U) September 6, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 653145/2014 Judge: Nancy M. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:33 pm
Co. of N.Y. v Joselyn Grocery Corp., 2008 NY Slip Op 31745[U]; see also Travelers Ins. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
Oregon Dept. of Agri-culture, 553 U. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 4:43 am
Montelione seems to be a case where the attorneys do not have insurance coverage nor insurance defense, and appeal to be pro-se. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:13 am
Ayyub 187 AD2d 373 [1st Dept 19921). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:48 am
Ayyub 187 AD2d 373 [1st Dept 19921). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:11 am
” “Here, S M Tam Architect has come forward with documentary evidence that conclusively establishes a defense as a matter of law, under CPLR § 3211(a)(1), and has shown that the complaint fails to state a cause of action against it, under CPLR § Here, S M Tam Architect has come forward with documentary evidence that conclusively establishes a defense as a matter of law, under CPLR § 3211(a)(1), and has shown that… [read post]
