Search for: "U S Dept of Defense" Results 121 - 140 of 227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2018, 4:19 am
  Default judgment entered against insured in u/a. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 2:19 am by Peter Mahler
, 2019 NY Slip Op 08141 [1st Dept Nov. 12, 2019]. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" Spoliation sanctions ... are not limited to cases where the evidence was destroyed willfully or in bad faith, since a party's negligent loss of evidence can be just as fatal to the other party's ability to present a defense'" (Standard Fire Ins. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
For the continuous representation doctrine to apply, “there must be clear indicia of an ongoing, continuous, developing, and dependent relationship between the client and the attorney which often includes an attempt by the attorney to rectify an alleged act of malpractice” (Luk Lamellen U Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 507 [2d Dept 1990]). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Kupferman’s decision in Celia v Celia (2023 NY Slip Op 30995(U) [Sup Ct, Saratoga County Mar. 31, 2013]). [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff asserts five affirmative defenses in its response to the counterclaims. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In 2003, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs (84 EPD ¶41,391), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provision in subparagraph (C). [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
NYC Health & Hosps., Corp .. 305 AD2d 634. 759 NYS2d 888 [2d Dept 2003]). [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
–––Jasmine D.], 165 A.D.3d 476, 85 N.Y.S.3d 430 [1st Dept. 2018]). [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:44 am
Defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) is also denied inasmuch as defendant's affidavit and the documents attached thereto do not definitively and "conclusively establish[ ] a defense to the asserted action as a matter of law" (Leon, 84 NY2d at 88); the documentary evidence merely raises numerous issues of fact, rather than finally dispose of them (see Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., P.C., 160 AD2d 428, 435 [1st Dept… [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 11:57 am
Since an NF-3 is clearly a prescribed verification form, would Judge Sweeney have found Progressive's EUO requests to be timely and non-appearance-based defense to be valid? [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 4:19 am by Jeremy Saland
Slip Op. 50223(U) (1st Dept. 2003) (At the pleading stage it was sufficient to merely allege that children were left home alone where they were five years and seven months old respectively, the mother lied about the children’s supervision and the seven month old fell out of bed); People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:40 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In Matter of Yu v Bong Yu, 2018 NY Slip Op 32009(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Aug. 15, 2018], the court considered the important but novel question of what impact, if any, does a shareholder’s assignment of voting rights under a stock pledge agreement have on his or her standing to sue for statutory dissolution of the business as well as under the common law. [read post]