Search for: "U. S. v. Nix*#"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2020, 10:44 am
State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:36 am
The Court ruled that an Oklahama Supreme Court's decision nixing contract provisions was a decision for an arbitrator (not the Oklahoma courts): State courts rather than federal courts are most frequently called upon to apply the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
Sosa, 542 U. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:47 am
Supreme Court will hear the oral arguments in the case Garriot v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:53 pm
Slip Op. 32512(U) (N.Y. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:33 am
Datatreasury Corp. v Del Col; 2012 NY Slip Op 31913(U); July 5, 2012; Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: 11-26774; Judge: John J.J. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:09 pm
Green, 411 U. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:34 pm
The second is the inevitable discovery doctrine, see Nix v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:03 am
V. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:25 pm
See also Nix v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 9:31 am
Id. at 5 (“[U]nless the challenge is to the arbitration clause itself, the issue of the contract’s validity is considered by the arbitrator in the first instance. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
But we know that’s simply not true. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
Randolph, 547 U. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Rivera v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
Cases creating and/or expanding this “inevitable discovery/likely discovery/possible independent source” exception to the exclusionary rule include Nix v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Ø Cat's Paw DoctrineStaub v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:06 am
V. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
On March 5, 2010, Plaintiff filed a complaint to compel the U. [read post]
