Search for: "U. S. v. Parente" Results 1 - 20 of 736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 7:00 am by Bret Cahn
In a publicized case, Matter of Goldfein v Kohler, Paulette Kohler’s building manager filed a petition to appoint a temporary guardian for her. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” Tier 2 applies to uninsured state or federally chartered depository institutions that are subject to federal prudential regulation and have holding company parents that are subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am by Jacquelyn Greene
Appeals may be taken by 1) the juvenile, 2) the juvenile’s parent, guardian, or custodian, 3) a county, or 4) the State. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The Court’s opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[8] The court went on to observe that “[u]sing enforcement actions to address crypto-assets is simply the latest chapter in a long history of giving meaning to the securities laws through iterative application to new situations. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm by Emma Babler
In fact, impacted parents navigate three interrelated temporal dimensions: the race to permanent legal separation through the termination of parental rights, the time-consuming process of having to prove that they are fit parents, and the possibility that tomorrow, the state’s concerns will drastically change. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:04 am by Frank Cranmer
In Ţîmpău v Romania [2023] ECHR 982, the applicant, Doina Ţîmpău, challenged her dismissal as a lay teacher of Orthodox religion in a public school. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Joanna Julius was riding as a passenger in her parents’ car in McDowell County when the person driving the car crashed it into a ditch filled with water. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Carson Turner
In Brace’s analysis, the Court grounded the tradition in parents’ substantive due process rights to direct their children’s upbringing, citizens’ democratic participation rights under the Equal Protection Clause, and federalism principles under the Tenth Amendment. [read post]