Search for: "U.S. v. Ate" Results 81 - 100 of 565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 6:24 am by Trey Childress
However, plaintiffs are facing growing barriers to ATS human rights litigation in the U.S. federal courts, and it is likely that the Supreme Court’s upcoming decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:30 am by Adam N. Steinman
Peña-Irala, which opened the door to human rights litigation in U.S. federal courts under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm by Trey Childress
  In addition to Kiobel, the Court also granted cert. in Mahamad v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:20 am
Finally, the article provides a comprehensive survey of all U.S. statutes that provide for universal jurisdiction, and finds that none of them do this implicitly, as the ATS was said to. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 4:57 pm by Trey Childress
First, according to the Court in the Kiobel decision, ATS cases are subject to the presumption against extraterritoriality recently rearticulated in Morrison v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:55 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The decision confirms the Circuit split over whether the ATS applies to corporations, siding with the Eleventh Circuit in Sinaltrainal v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm by John Bellinger
Although the panel held that the ATS did apply extraterritorially to cover plaintiffs’ claims, it nonetheless remanded the case to the district court to determine whether the suit presented a non-justiciable political question in light of the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Taylor v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Previously, the Kiobel case had focused only on whether corporations could be sued in U.S. courts under the ATS for foreign violations of global law. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by Eugene Kontorovich
But another case soon to be (re)argued before the Court, Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 am by Meir Feder
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]