Search for: "UNITED AIR LINES INC" Results 61 - 80 of 678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm by James Romoser
Fellow law enforcement officers lined 1 First Street to pay their respects. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, the court noted that CEQA requires a focus on the projects impact on the environment, not the environment’s impact on the project to conclude that petitioners had improperly framed the fair argument test. [read post]
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, the court noted that CEQA requires a focus on the projects impact on the environment, not the environment’s impact on the project to conclude that petitioners had improperly framed the fair argument test. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 11:23 am by Sean Wajert
Plaintiffs were current and former employees of Delta Air Lines who wore uniforms manufactured by defendant Lands’ End. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 11:58 am by gabrielagendreau
The Associate Attorney will: (1) Work with ELPC’s Executive Director and Senior Attorneys on litigation and innovative climate action policy initiatives for ELPC’s clean energy, clean water, clean transportation, clean air, climate change solution, and natural resource protection programs. (2) Assist on special projects. (3) Engage with multidisciplinary project teams. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Back in 2008, Professor Michael Green wrote an interesting paper on apportionment in asbestos litigation. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
FCC, which upheld a statute that required cable systems to carry over-the-air broadcasters; and Rumsfeld v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]