Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FRYE" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am by Schachtman
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert is now over 25 years old. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Preemption, of course, would be The Beatles, and Daubert/Frye the Rolling Stones. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:00 pm by Sean Wajert
(Note that my partner Mark Behrens was asked to submit an amicus brief on behalf of the Coalition For Litigation Justice, Inc., Chamber Of Commerce Of The United States Of America, NFIB Small Business Legal Center, American Insurance Association, Property Casualty Insurers Association Of America, American Chemistry Council, And National Association Of Manufacturers.) [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 661 N.E.2d 352, 354 (Ill. 1996); Frye v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
United Parcel Service, Inc., 2010 WL 1257931, at *2 (D. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
"[The following article includes a table which lists out the statutorily permissible uses of polygraph examination in the different state jurisdictions of the United States of America: Henry T. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:15 pm by Adam Schlossman
Brief for respondent Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Title: McNeill, Clifton T. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:26 am by John Elwood
United States, 09–1555, Beer v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]