Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GINSBURG"
Results 121 - 140
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2019, 5:56 pm
The basic question in the case is whether the United States government (here the USPS) counts as “a person who is not the owner of a patent. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:27 am
That the election of the President of the United States of America should hinge on someone like my mother’s ability to figure out how to use a ballot was a matter of some serious concern. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:09 am
(For example, I argued beforehand that the court would be wrong to rule as it did in Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Today’s opinion by Justice Ginsburg in Greenlaw v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:43 am
In the last episode of The Ginsburg Tapes, Lauren Moxley analyzes Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s final argument in the Supreme Court as an advocate in November 1978, in Duren v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
”Once it was established that adults in the United States had the right to buy and use contraception, the attention shifted to access. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
Needless to say, any time the United States Supreme Supreme Court issues a case involving preemption, we here at Abnormal Use pay close attention. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The United States of America should be permitted to do so, if at all, only in response to the most pressing concerns. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm
” Thus, the recent United States Supreme Court decision on pay equity, Ledbetter v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:17 am
Morales-Santana does not quite rise to the level of United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:02 pm
A word search shows this is only the fifth time a Supreme Court opinion has mentioned the WTO, along with Crosby v NFTC (2000), JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred (2001), United Haulers v Oneida-Herkimer (2007), and Golan v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
In the United States, the First Congress debated whether to append successful amendments or to integrate their content into the original text. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:14 am
Sotomayor noted that the INA already includes categorical bars to asylum involving an asylum applicant’s stay in another country prior to seeking asylum in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” Commentary comes from Ken Jost at Jost on Justice, who observes that jurors “may bring other kinds of bias into the jury room, but those cases are no reason to back away from one limited safeguard against the racial discrimination that still pervades criminal justice in the United States,” and from Mark Joseph Stern in Slate, who asks how, if Chief Justice John Roberts does not recognize the pernicious effects of racial bias in this case, Roberts can “ever… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:31 pm
Perhaps as a result, (4) most places within the United States have abandoned its use. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Texas (2003), United States v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
That women are the peculiar bearers of America’s constitutional failings seems obvious after Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 9:21 am
In Washington v. [read post]
