Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NEWMAN" Results 21 - 40 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
  The lawsuit resolved by this settlement is captioned United States of America, et al., ex rel. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:29 am
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2011 Heard: June 26, 2012 Decided: May 14, 2013 Docket No. 11-5113-cv(L), 12-491-cv(XAP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, THE VULCAN SOCIETY, INC., MARCUS HAYWOOD, CANDIDO NUNEZ, ROGER GREGG, Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:40 am by totmauthor
Virginia State Bar (the First Amendment protects the rights of union members to “maintain and carry out their plan for advising workers who are injured to obtain legal advice”); United Mine Workers of America, Dist. 12 v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 11:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Weexplained that the Board’s interpretation of its regulationsin denying the proposed amendment was reasonableunder the particular circumstances in Proxyconn and wasconsistent with the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice’s (“PTO’s”) position expressed in the Board’s informativedecision in Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
(collectively, “MadStad”) filed suit against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), its then director, David Kappos, in his official capacity, and the United States of America (collectively, “the Government”) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:18 am by Gene Quinn
Federal Circuit: Foreign Application Not Priority in Interference When it Only “Envisions” InventionLast week the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling in Goeddel v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In addition to requesting a remand under United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 4:32 am by Jo Dale Carothers
  In fact, the government specifically names both entities in the petition, captioning it The United States Postal Service (USPS) and The United States of America v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
” Our predecessor court recognized the vitality of Gardiner in Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm by Mark Ashton
 Blackstone’s influence on American law was so great that his Commentaries were published in the United States well into the 20th century. [read post]