Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Smith" Results 161 - 180 of 740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:13 pm by Amy Howe
United States (Wednesday, Dec. 5) This post was originally published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
Brennan of the United States Supreme Court stated in Furman v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
 USPTO Director David Kappos stated:  “Since the enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, we have worked in concert with our stakeholder community to launch transformative initiatives to improve the way Americans innovate, and the way the USPTO handles those innovations. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am by David Kopel
The concealed carry ban in the new state of Kentucky was soon ruled unconstitutional in Bliss v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]