Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT: et al" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California aptly explained in United States of America v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
Your Curmudgeon is currently in Quincy, Illinois, working with co-counsel to prepare for the upcoming trial, which starts next week, in the case of The Diocese of Quincy, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 5:00 pm by Jacqueline L. Bonneau, Alvin Li
  Furthermore, the Court noted “that any dispute arising under and concerning the interpretation and enforcement of the Stipulation shall be resolved in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
    CPLR § 2106 was adopted to provide alternatives to affidavits requiring notarization for those persons who are physically located outside the United States of America               In S.B., v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
The recent judgment of the CJEU in Case C‑616/10, Solvay SA v Honeywell et al. [read post]