Search for: "UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON et al" Results 41 - 60 of 72
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by Brett Trout
Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution secures to authors, for a limited time, the exclusive right to their writings. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by Brett Trout
Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution secures to authors, for a limited time, the exclusive right to their writings. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
United States On 16 June 2014, in the case of Sarah Jones v Dirty World Entertainment [pdf] the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a libel judgment in favour of a former cheerleader for the Cincinnati Bengals Football Team. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Free Speech for People et al.Amicus brief of Citizens UnitedAmicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of AmericaAmicus brief of Senator Mitch McConnell Amicus brief of Former Officials of the American Civil Liberties Union in support of neither partyAmicus brief of Retired Montana Supreme Court Justices Amicus brief of United States Representatives Robert Brady et… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-883; Brito v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
 As this piece was being written, a “new arrival” is Kraft Foods Global, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Saudi Arabian Oil Co.Docket: 10-1393Issue(s): (1) Whether the political question doctrine deprives the federal courts of jurisdiction to adjudicate a Sherman Act and Clayton Act damage case against both private and state-owned businesses operating in the United States; and (2) whether the act of state doctrine bars antitrust claims against defendants whose conduct was commercial, and where it came to fruition and had its effect in the United… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:14 pm by Sheppard Mullin
SanDisk Corporation, et al., United States District Court, ND Cal., Case No. 5:10-CV02787-JF/HRL, the court denied a motion to dismiss in a Walker Process "fraud on patent office" case, and allowed standing to a direct purchaser. [read post]