Search for: "US Explore and Study, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2021, 9:15 am by Kristian Soltes
The Paypers – May 21, 2021 In 2020, a study by CMSPI and Zephyre found that, on average, European merchants were paying more to accept each card transaction than they had prior to regulation. [read post]
6 May 2021, 8:24 am by Kristian Soltes
Together, we looked at data from Prosper Insights & Analytics studies on mobile payment trends. [read post]
3 May 2021, 2:12 pm by William Ford, Tia Sewell
Wednesday, May 5, 2021, at 2:30 p.m.: The House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Innovation will hold a hearing titled, "Responding to Ransomware: Exploring Policy Solutions to a Cybersecurity Crisis. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Mike Nagata, senior vice president of CACI International Inc.; retired Lt. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:09 am by John Jascob
Arnuk also cited a study which found that when Robinhood experiences technology outages, spreads in the general market become narrower. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:42 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Joseph Kirschbaum, director of the Government Accountability Office; Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute; and William Conley, chief technology officer at Mercury Systems, Inc. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Maintaining standards My research has explored how regulators no longer use a stopwatch to police impartiality in broadcast coverage of political parties. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What I want to explore here, though, is a different line of critique. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
Below, I explore the rationales for legal regulation we often turn to—and those we too often forget. [read post]
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:29 pm by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
If you have an announcement to add to the page, email us. [read post]