Search for: "US Fidelis, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 1,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 6:08 am by Adam Klasfeld
Doing a favor for Schwartzenegger helped the company secure his cooperation with other AMI magazines like Us, Muscle Fitness, and Flex. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Circuit Court of Appeals opinion from 1969, Community Blood Bank of Kansas City Area, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 4:52 am by Erica Blachman Hitchings
  Some recent examples are: Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc paid $360 million to resolve claims that it illegally paid thousands of Medicare patients’ co-pays for its pulmonary arterial hypertension drugs. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 2:42 pm by Sofya Asatryan
BBK also sought to void several of CCA’s federal trademark applications for the RAW GARDEN mark, filed on an intent-to-use basis, due to a lack of bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:20 am
Central Coast Agriculture, Inc., Appeals Nos. 22-16190 and 16281 (9th Cir. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 2:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
We also hold that lack of bona fide intent to use a mark in commerce is a valid basis to challenge a trademark application. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:30 pm
Just weeks earlier, Southwest had purchased a so-called cyber risk insurance policy from non-party AIG, Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:15 am by Steve Brachmann
The Ninth Circuit panel majority determined that the district court had statutory authority to invalidate a trademark application for no bona fide intent to use over a dissent authored by U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:15 am by Steve Brachmann
The Ninth Circuit panel majority determined that the district court had statutory authority to invalidate a trademark application for no bona fide intent to use over a dissent authored by U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:38 am by CMS
Following the decision of the House of Lords, in Macmillan Inc v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am by Peter J. Sluka
 And the LLC law does not prohibit an LLC’s use of equity-based compensation. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
The government contends that there is no split, that different courts of appeals merely “use different verbal formulations,” and that the usual four-factor test gives insufficient deference to the NLRB’s expertise. [read post]