Search for: "US Fidelis, Inc"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,020
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2021, 2:37 am
In re Joy Tea Inc., Serial No. 88640009 (September 1, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert H. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 8:28 pm
Medtronic, Inc., is announcing that it is voluntarily suspending worldwide distribution of the Sprint Fidelis family of defibrillation leads. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:28 am
of the Trademark Act must verify that he/she/it has a bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 3:47 am
Wet Seal, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:16 am
Licensing Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 2:26 am
" Raintree Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:04 pm
§ 1104(a)(1) in the chapter 11 bankruptcy case of US Fidelis, Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:02 am
As characterized on the web site for this Committee, Waxman's letter is "requesting information about the Agency's approval of Medtronic's Sprint Fidelis leads, which are components used in implantable cardiac defibrillators. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 6:56 pm
Medtronic, Inc., is announcing that it is voluntarily suspending worldwide distribution of the Sprint Fidelis family of defibrillation leads. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:18 am
No. 1 (2011)) and held that Pitney Bowes Inc., a private equity investor in the Historic Boardwalk Hall partnership that was used to rehabilitate the Atlantic City landmark of the same name, was not a bona fide partner and... [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:18 pm
Hayes, MD, "The Increasing Hazard of Sprint Fidelis Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Failure", which pits these two prominent cardiologists against Medtronic, Inc., the company that made the Sprint Fidelis lead wires. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 11:53 am
See PRL USA Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 2:17 am
However, “not all use prior to notice of the dispute can qualify as bona fide use,” World Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:57 pm
Hauser, reporter Janet Moore of the Star-Tribune newspaper in Minnesota -- where Medtronic Inc. is headquartered -- picked up the Sprint Fidelis story in a July 30, 2007 article, "Medtronic device under scrutiny": In late March [2007], Medtronic Inc. sent a letter to doctors advising them that the wire leads in a line of widely used heart defibrillators could tear at a "higher than expected" rate. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 2:42 am
In Re: Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:19 am
Thousands of patients currently use the Sprint Fidelis lead. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
DC Comics and Marvel Characters, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 3:44 pm
All six cases involved the Sprint Fidelis 6949, manufactured by Medtronic Inc., a leading medical-device maker. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:21 am
In view thereof, we find that there is no genuine issue that the permanent injunction applies to applicant.Because the injunction enjoins Applicant from using the applied-for mark, Applicant cannot make lawful use of the mark, and therefore it is legally impossible for Applicant to have a bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce.TTABlog comment: Apparently with the death of Johnny Carson and the expiration of his federal registrations for HERE'S JOHNNY,… [read post]
21 May 2008, 10:31 am
Medtronic, Inc. sent a letter out a few weeks ago to patients who still have the "recalled" Sprint Fidelis defibrillator leads in their chests. [read post]
