Search for: "US Foam, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
<> EPA Identifies Safer Substitutes for Toxic Flame Retardants - EPA is announcing safer alternatives to the flame retardants now used in consumer and commercial products, including building insulation and products with flexible polyurethane foam. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:33 am by WIMS
<> Groundbreaking Legal Agreement to End Use of Toxic Flame Retardant in Foam Furniture and Children's Products - The Center for Environmental Health (CEH) announced groundbreaking legal agreements that for the first time aim for an end to the use of harmful flame retardant chemicals in foam furniture and children's foam products from major companies. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 8:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tempur Sealy International, Inc.,  No. 13–2451, 2013 WL 6767821 (D. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:26 am by John L. Welch
In re Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc., Serial No. 85157275 (May 24, 2013) [not precedential].Both applicant and Examining Attorney Aretha C. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 10:27 pm by John L. Welch
Sleep Innovations, Inc., Cancellation No. 92054201 (May 13, 2013) [precedential].Exclusion of Evidence: Petitioner Dan Foam obtained certain documents from a third-party via subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 3:30 am by Larry Bache
According to Helicon Foundation Repair, “[u]nderpinning is a foundation repair method used to fix sinkhole damaged structures. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:04 am
The US Trademark Office issued the following  137 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in February, 2013, based on applications filed by Indiana Trademark Attorneys:  Reg. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:50 am by admin
  Domfoam International Inc. and Valle Foam Industries Inc. pleaded guilty to conspiracy under section 45 of the Act and were fined a total of $12.5 million for participating in a price-fixing conspiracy for polyurethane foam. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:56 am by John L. Welch
In the context of an ornamentality refusal, "secondary source" simply means that the use of the design or words would be perceived by the consumer as an indicator of source due to the applicant's prior use or registration of the mark for other goods or services (not the applied-for goods).Lululemon asserted that it has used "the same mark" for related goods and services: on a storefront, Christmas ball ornaments, shopping bag, luggage bag, gift card, wool cap, jacket,… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
While in law school, Dirk interned at Novant Health, Inc., a regional health care system, and also volunteered for two years as the Assistant Director of the Wake Forest Innocence Project where he worked on actual innocence claims and reintegration of recently released prisoners. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:28 pm by James L. Higgins
’s OLUX-E® (clobetasol propionate) Foam, 0.05%: “occlusive agent” “an amount sufficient to form an occlusive layer on the skin, in use” “an amount up to 50% by weight, based on the total weight of the composition” “insoluble” Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am by Schachtman
Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 874 F.2d 307, 311-12 (5th Cir. 1989)(“Fortunately, we do not have to resolve any of the above questions [as to bias and confounding], since the studies presented to us incorporate the possibility of these factors by the use of a confidence interval. [read post]