Search for: "US v. Melendez" Results 1 - 20 of 366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2010, 8:01 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Recently I wrote about how the Supreme Court decisions in Melendez-Diaz(129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]) and Briscoe v Virginia (559 US ___ [1/25/10]) appeared to undermine and contracidt hte holdings of the New York Court of Appeals in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]). [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am by Andrew Hamm
Although some have argued that Dookhan’s dry-labbing demonstrates the necessity of the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:31 am
  But on Monday, the US Supreme Court granted review in Briscoe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 3:52 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
A substantially similar issue was decided this summer by the SCOTUS in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 6:32 pm by Matt Cameron
Anyone who hated Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:56 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  It’s an outstanding piece of scholarship that will be useful to those of us litigating Melendez-Diaz issues. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 2:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Argument Preview: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 4:58 am
Brown on sexual assault charges over claims that the admission of of a DNA report processed by a subcontractor laboratory to the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) through the testimony of a forensic biologist from OCME violated the right of confrontation as discussed in Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:34 am by Matt Cameron
Unfortunately for Melendez-Diaz, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts had already squarely addressed this issue in Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Here are some early thoughts about the majority opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Even more clearly than the printout bearing an identifying marker, the certificate is a human assertion prepared for prosecutorial use. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of argument in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:36 am
For some counties, round trip is going to be 10 to 12 hours to testify" for the lab analyst to travel to court.Burns said 42 states and the District are affected by the Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]