Search for: "US v. Peake"
Results 1 - 20
of 862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2012, 1:51 pm
As detailed in Save the Peaks Coalition v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:39 am
<> In Defense of Animals v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:23 pm
Nevertheless, we hold that the Save the Peaks Plaintiffs' claims fail under NEPA and the APA. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 7:41 am
The post OT2017 #9: “Peak SG” appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:38 pm
Which was also a case brought against the US Forest Service, was also in Arizona, was also somewhat strongly worded (though far less so), which also seems to have involved successive litigation and application of res judicata principles (at least according to footnote two), and which reversed the dismissal of plaintiff's claims. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 8:35 am
In State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:24 pm
In advance of today’s argument in Peake v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:12 pm
See Twin Peaks Software Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 7:34 am
The case reference is Kaplan v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
”); Carr v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:30 am
There’s another card in play here: the US Supreme Court’s decision two months in Padilla v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:54 am
As applied to a major modification made to a cycling or peaking — as opposed to a baseload — power plant, a three-judge panel of the US Court Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
Demand response is a program in which consumers receive a payment for reductions in electricity use during peak times. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:20 am
With its 1927 decision in Buck v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:20 am
With its 1927 decision in Buck v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 12:58 pm
Ker v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 4:52 pm
In Peake v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:32 pm
The so-called "peak average molecular weight" mentioned in Teva v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:55 am
Although Exergen v. [read post]
