Search for: "US v. Pineda" Results 81 - 100 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Kevin
However, invariably judges will be asked to interpret these regulations - and as a recent California court case shows, their decisions may be unsettling.In Pineda v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
Earlier this month, the DC Circuit exposed the flaws in the 9th’s logic in US v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:17 am by Greg Blankinship
Code, § 1747.08, a nearly identical statute, the California Supreme Court recently held in Pineda v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 12:33 am
Barry Trupin, defendant-appellee NEW YORK COUNTYLabor LawIRCA Does Not Preclude Illegal Workers From Pursuing Claims to Recover Money for Work Already Performed Pineda v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:25 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
The Massachusetts court’s determination that a ZIP code constitutes personal identification information is similar to the determination in Pineda v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:41 am by Steve Satterfield
  (The California Supreme Court reached this same conclusion interpreting a very similar statute in Pineda v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:25 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
The Massachusetts court’s determination that a ZIP code constitutes personal identification information is similar to the determination in Pineda v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:00 am by Shaun McParland Baldwin
  A rash of class action suits have been filed following a recent ruling by California Supreme Court in Pineda v. [read post]