Search for: "USA v. Bayer"
Results 61 - 80
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Sonus USA, Inc., 2005 WL 6198234, at ??? [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:13 pm
Forum Selection Clause Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Bayer Corp., 2004 WL 7081940, at *3 (W.D. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:21 am
Yesterday, in Golan v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
: Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v Roche Molecular Systems Inc (IPKat) US: That was unexpectedly… well… expected: BPAI affirms Examiner’s obviousness rejection in Ex Parte Akio Ochiai concerning a health food product containing curcumin, scymnol and isoflavones (BT-IP Notes) US: VirginiaTech VERSUS series – Drug evaluation DVDs available (FDA Law Blog) Products Diovan HCT (Valsartan, Hydrochlorothiazide) – Germany:… [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Eloxatin (Oxaliplatin) – US: District Court New Jersey grants summary judgment of non-infringement in favour of Hospira, Teva and others concerning patent relating to Sanofi’s Eloxatin: Sanofi-Aventis v Sandoz (SmartBrief) (The IP Factor) (GenericsWeb) (Patents4Life) General Europe’s ever changing landscape… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
See Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm
Bayer Schering Pharma A.G. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp., 548 F. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp., 548 F. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp., 548 F. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp., 548 F. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Bieffe USA, Inc., 35 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bieffe USA, Inc., 35 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bieffe USA, Inc., 35 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bieffe USA, Inc., 35 F. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Bayer (Baycol) Trial2005-01-21 Hardy v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Bayer (Baycol) Trial2005-01-21 Hardy v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm
Armstrong prior to 2005; (3) its exclusive jurisdiction over the drug tests upon which USADA relies including tests in 2001 and 2009–10; (4) its authority to delegate disciplinary responsibility to USA Cycling; (5) its duty to review proposed disciplinary proceedings against its license-holders; (6) its obligation to review the evidence and determine whether it constitutes reliable means of proving an anti-doping violation before any anti-doping charge is brought against Mr. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 837 A.2d 534, 541 (Pa. [read post]
