Search for: "USA v. Hong" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
Other taxes, such as Stamp duty, business tax, land appreciation tax, and other indirect taxes are not convered by the arrangement, and therefore, the liability for those mainland taxes still remain enforced. [26] V. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd (2017): Orthodoxy RulesPey Woan Lee (Singapore Management University, Singapore) [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Ushin Hong and Russell Mendelson have a preview at Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Ushin Hong and Russell Mendelson have a preview for Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 8:41 am by elizabethw
In the top half of the page Secondary Materials describes commentary (law journals & books) – but for the USA these have become Analytical Materials. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 8:28 am by John Jascob
SIC 6770 public registrants are Hong Kong’s AP Acquisition and Malaysia-based DUET Acquisition. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Factual BackgroundSky's Now TV logo in 2012Starbucks was part of a group called PCCM which had been running its service NOW TV in Hong Kong under that name since 2006 and was the largest pay TV operator in Hong Kong by 2012 when this litigation commenced. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:07 am
v=3l7Ulx0Bozg&feature=related***ARTICLES ABOUT J HENDRIK SCHON***Query: what is the first citation in the paper -->Science DOI: 10.1126/science.1066171Science Express IndexREPORTSThis article has been retractedSubmitted on September 12, 2001Accepted on October 25, 2001Field-Effect Modulation of the Conductance of Single MoleculesJan Hendrik Schön 1*, Hong Meng 1, Zhenan Bao 11 Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, 600 Mountain Avenue,… [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
  This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]