Search for: "USA v. James et al" Results 61 - 80 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Engrasp, Inc. et al (Docket Report)   US Copyright S 978 Bill would strengthen criminal copyright infringement law (Maryland IP Law)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court E D Missouri: Copyright and tattoos: Hangover II preliminary injunction denied, but copyright owner got some good news too: Whitmill v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Aug. 29, 2008)(Hecht)(oil and gas law, trespass, rule of capture)COASTAL OIL & GAS CORPORATION AND COASTAL OIL & GAS USA, L.P. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
Trademark vs branding – Sci Fi Channel will now be called Syfy (China Hearsay)   Europe CFI: Mars loses CTM right in 3D shape for chocolate snacks: Mars v OHIM, Ludwig Schokolade (Class 46) (The IP Factor) CFI: James Bond fails again to defeat DR. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Poetman Records USA, Inc. 2010 (Copyright Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinios: Party claiming copyright ownership not a rule 19 necessary party: Zimnicki v. [read post]