Search for: "USA v. Slaughter" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by William C. MacLeod and Darby Hobbs
  Some called for Congress to restore the FTC’s authority to seek monetary remedies for deceptive practices under 13(b), which the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
  The rule will especially benefit small businesses that rely on the Made in USA label, but lack the resources to defend themselves from imitators. [read post]
Ga.)); Bring a complaint in California federal court along with Attorneys General from six states (claims made by five states based on pendent jurisdiction dismissed in FTC v. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
Starting in 2002 and continuing for about a decade, 1-800 Contacts systematically locked up many of its online contact lenses retail competitors into settlement agreements that prohibited the parties from bidding on each other’s trademarks at the search engines. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:30 am by Walter Haydock
In June, a gunman slaughtered 49 people in Orlando, Florida, pledging allegiance to the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in the process. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 11:38 am by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
One of the two was a member of the group Raqqa is being Slaughtered Silently, which reports on ISIS atrocities within the group’s de facto capital. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
First up is Montgomery v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 2:31 am by INFORRM
USA A libel suit has been filed against the son of rock promoter Barry Fey. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 7:01 am by Joy Waltemath
The defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted on all claims (Lukudu v JBS USA, LLC, March 14, 2014, Russell, T). [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:26 am by Dan Flynn
” Since last Monday, all parties in the Front Range Equine Rescue v Vilsack case have expected Judge M. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:34 am by Joy Waltemath
In what is likely to be viewed as a big win for employers seeking to defend religious discrimination claims, a federal district court in Nebraska granted an employer’s Rule 52 motion for judgment after trial on Phase I of EEOC litigation on behalf of Muslim employees claiming they were denied time for prayers required by their religion (EEOC v JBS USA, LLC, D. [read post]