Search for: "USA v. Smith et al" Results 61 - 80 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by Rachael Hanna
The government argued, and the district court found, that the third-party doctrine of Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Miller, et al    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitCOBRA; EQUITABLE ESTOPPELBOGGS, Chief Judge. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:33 am by Sean Wajert
SETH BAKER, ET AL., No. 15-457 (U.S., petition granted 1/15/16). [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:33 am by Sean Wajert
SETH BAKER, ET AL., No. 15-457 (U.S., petition granted 1/15/16). [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
Microsoft et al.[25]   In Motionless Keyboard, the inventor of a new keyboard showed his keyboard to investors, a friend, a business partner  and a typist prior to filing an application. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:27 pm by Lauren Abbott
HSBC Bank, USA, et al. in the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in support of the consumer-appellant, arguing that courts have not correctly interpreted the federal Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”) regarding how long a consumer has to rescind a mortgage loan. [read post]