Search for: "USA v. WOLFE" Results 41 - 60 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2016, 8:02 am
" And Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "Supreme Court gives black death-row inmate new life. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm by Jon Levitan
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Carpenter v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:58 am
" Richard Wolf and David Jackson of USA Today report that "Obama warns against 'judicial activism' on health care law. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm by Jodie Liu
Importantly, this extension also covers the no-longer-controversial roving wiretap and lone-wolf terrorist provisions that sunset along with the 215 program. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
” Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that Kavanaugh delivered “a self-effacing, 34-minute address almost completely devoid of controversial topics. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
  In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews three cases on the Court’s docket that “will bring the delicate issue of religion back to the court chamber, along with questions about politics, public safety and Middle East peace. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that as Justice Neil Gorsuch reaches his one-year anniversary on the Supreme Court bench today, in a number of “ways — from his core legal philosophy to his supreme self-confidence — he is very much like his predecessor on the court,” Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
  The webinar, which will feature Jeff Wall of Sullivan & Cromwell, Lori Alvino McGill of Quinn Emanuel, and Richard Wolf of USA Today, will discuss cases from this Term affecting state and local government, including King v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:06 am by Amy Howe
  And Richard Wolf previews the case for USA Today, describing it as an example of how a “simple case about license plates becomes a crucial test of the First Amendment, pitting freedom of speech against government authority. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Richard Wolf and Jon Swartz at USA Today, who note that the “acrimonious battle between the world’s two most successful smartphone makers, which began in April 2011, could redefine a 130-year-old design patent law and upend the tech industry. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Richard Wolf for USA Today, who reports that “[i]n a case that could have broad implications for privacy rights in the digital age, justices on both sides of the ideological spectrum said rapid advances in technology make decades-old precedents inadequate. [read post]
13 May 2014, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
” At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses M&G Polymers USA v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:33 am
" And Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "Justices block law denying bail to illegal immigrants charged with felonies. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
" And Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "Supreme Court will hear new challenge to affirmative action. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
" And Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "Supreme Court upholds health law subsidies" and "Supreme Court upholds housing discrimination law. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm by JLiu
Importantly, this extension also covers the no-longer-controversial roving wiretap and lone-wolf terrorist provisions that sunset along with the 215 program. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
Next month’s oral argument in King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:41 pm by Kalvis Golde
This morning the court issued an opinion in Kisor v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:45 pm by Howard Bashman
” Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court appears wary of taking on federal agencies over regulations. [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:51 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the story for this blog; other coverage comes from Richard Wolf of USA Today and from Robert Barnes and Mark Berman of The Washington Post, while Rick Hasen discusses the case and the Court’s order at his Election Law Blog. [read post]