Search for: "Union Carbide"
Results 81 - 100
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2014, 10:37 am
The Supreme Court of Canada today issued a ruling that put clear limits on boilerplate confidentiality clauses in mediated settlements.The decision in Union Carbide Canada v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:20 pm
In Union Carbide Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:57 am
Union Carbide Corp., No. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:43 am
In this, our final post of the Union Carbide/Dow Taft plant chemical leak series, we will consider the fifth requirement for class certification under Louisiana law: that the class is "defined objectively in terms of ascertainable criteria, such that the court may determine the constituency of the class for purposes of the conclusiveness of any judgment that may be rendered in the case. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:08 am
The panel was established at the request of the United States, the European Union and Mexico on December 21, 2009. [read post]
23 May 2010, 6:11 am
Jurors found that chemical giant Union Carbide was negligent for selling asbestos fibers to other companies, which had used the fibers to make joint compounds used by construction companies -- such as the one William Aubin's family owned. [read post]
10 May 2014, 5:30 am
Confidentiality term in mediation agr does not prevent proof of settlement, Union Carbide v Bombardier 2014 SCC 35 http://t.co/uyBlyTs3m6 -> Government snooping on social media may breach Privacy Act http://t.co/AhiPJKnx6R -> New anti-spam law CASL ‘a big deal’ for small businesses – a must read for SME sales and marketers http://t.co/YOCHlNgmRW -> Canada’s Internet censorship law CASL (Canada's anti-speech law) kicks in on Canada Day… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:04 am
Early in the morning of July 7, 2009, a 640,000 gallon chemical storage tank at Union Carbide/Dow Chemical's Taft plant began to rupture. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm
" This new open-access digital archive includes over 3,700 documents collected by Marc Galanter (University of Wisconsin), who was involved in the US-India litigation following the 1984 toxic gas leak at the Union Carbide plant in Bhopal, India. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:32 pm
A Union Carbide spokesman told the LB: This verdict is outrageous and completely unsupported by the facts or applicable law. . . . [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
In June the defendant Union Carbide moved for Judge Bowen's recusal in the case because his father sued Union Carbide 20 years ago and settled the case. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:39 am
If there is a downside for Union Carbide, it is that the case is still pending in Smith County. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:14 pm
When Bowen didn't respond, Union Carbide went to the Supreme Court and asked the justices to remove him. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:25 am
In our previous post, we began a discussion of the Union Carbide/Dow Chemical Taft plant chemical leak litigation filed by the Berniard Law Firm. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:43 am
Union Carbide continues to deny responsibility for a plant "designed, owned, operated and managed" by its subsidiary Union Carbide India Ltd. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:43 am
Union Carbide continues to deny responsibility for a plant "designed, owned, operated and managed" by its subsidiary Union Carbide India Ltd. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:27 am
newsid=1408 Loon Canada newspaper http://looncanada.com/2010/06/07/former-union-carbide-boss-warren-anderson-still-on-the-lam-from-bhopal-criminal-charges/ The Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jun/9/india-seeks-extradition-ex-chief-of-union-carbide/ Bhopal Information Center, Union Carbide http://www.bhopal.com/court.htm International Campaign for Justice in Bhopal http://bhopal.net/2010dharna/blog/ [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:05 pm
State Department throws new light on the issue of extradition of Warren Anderson, CEO of Union Carbide India Limited and prime accused in the Union Carbide industrial disaster. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 9:08 am
Union Carbide initially filed a motion for recusal at the trial court level, but at least 30 days later, the trial judge had yet to respond, prompting Union Carbide to seek relief from a higher court. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 1:22 am
However, a settlement offer by Union Carbide was rejected by the plaintiff. [read post]
