Search for: "Unite Here v. Food and Drug Administration"
Results 81 - 100
of 447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 6:32 am
In PLIVA, the Court is considering whether generic drug manufacturers can be sued under state law for failing to provide safety information that is not required by the federal Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 5:56 am
United Food, at *22. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 740 F.2d at 34. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:03 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 5:32 pm
Court ofAppeals1996-2001 Private practice, Washington, D.C.2001-2003 Associate Chief Counsel, Food & Drug Administration Rockville, MD2004 Law clerk, chambers of the Honorable Elizabeth McClanahan, Court ofAppeals of Virginia, Abingdon2005-2006 Private practice in Abingdon, Virginia [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will use existing authorities to impose security and privacy requirements on consumer goods – hopefully in the form of standards but possibly in the form of mandates. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:12 am
Food and Drug Administration, 4040 North Central Expressway, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75204. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Procedural HistoryThe New Drug Application (NDA) for the Tarka® product was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1996 and acquired by Abbott Laboratories in 2001. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
Stengel 12-1351Issue: Whether the Medical Device Amendments to the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act preempt a state-law claim alleging that a medical device manufacturer violated a duty under federal law to report adverse-event information to the Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
Wyeth countered that because use of the warning label was mandated by the FDA pursuant to its authority under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), Ms. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
The would-be class consisted of:all other persons similarly situated, throughout the United States, who are domociled [sic] in one of the fifty states, including Ohio, and who are consumers who received ANY vaccine or drug with a PharmaJet injector device where the specific vaccine or specific drug does not have the stated approval by the FDA for administration with a “needleless injector” or “needle-free injector,” also know [sic]… [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Here’s one. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:06 am
United Foods. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:52 pm
The civil lawsuit, Beaty, et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 1:41 pm
The FDA’s powers come from the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act (“FDCA”). [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:53 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
The Supreme Court has construed the safe harbor to apply to drugs as well as medical devices and other products subject to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
The Supreme Court has construed the safe harbor to apply to drugs as well as medical devices and other products subject to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. [read post]
