Search for: "United Citizens Party of South Carolina"
Results 101 - 120
of 359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm
(The suit is proceeding below against other parties.) [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:01 am
The opinion, delivered by Chief Justice Roger Taney, declared that all people of African ancestry, whether slave or free, were not citizens of the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
The Court considered Brown’s case along with similar cases from South Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
It raised questions about the impartiality of the official, Debbie Chacona, who oversees the unit responsible for keeping unlawful contributions out of political campaigns. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:24 am
South Carolina HB 3490 / SB 444: Adjournment is June 7, however neither bill has advanced out of committee since being introduced in early 2011. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:30 am
The efficiency of centralized parties with informative labels may be brutal, but it offers a remarkable coordinating device for millions of citizens. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
In an amicus brief filed in support of neither party in DeBoer v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:43 am
Padilla filed suits in South Carolina against Rumsfeld (and other Department of Defense officials) and against John Yoo in California for damages related to the injuries he suffered while in military detention. [read post]
22 May 2013, 7:15 pm
” But [South Carolina Republican Sen. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
Spears, United States Supreme Court (6/17/13)Consumer Law, Legal Ethics, Professional Malpractice & EthicsUsing FOIA requests directed to the South Carolina DMV, attorneys obtained names and addresses, then sent letters to more than 34,000 individuals, seeking clients for a lawsuit against car dealerships for violation of a state law. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
He includes the Liberty Party platform of 1843 and material on Samuel Hoar’s expulsion from South Carolina. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
South Carolina, for example, passed a law in 1882 that required all potential voters to re-register, but delegated to election administrators broad discretion in determining voting eligibility. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:34 pm
Thus, under United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 5:51 am
Many were held on the coast of Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina during June and July. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The racial schisms that Nixon, Reagan, and the Bushes played on with their southern strategies, which reshaped the Republican Party in the South and rural areas, became a racial divide during Obama’s years in the White House. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
District Court Judge who has the case raised a critical issue sua sponte (on her own).The issue she raised was the issue of jurisdiction: Federal question jurisdiction clearly did not exist in this case because, as Wikipedia notes, federal question jurisdiction exists only when “the plaintiff has alleged a violation of the United States Constitution, federal law, or a treaty to which the United States is a party. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:52 pm
We will continue our fight in states like Senator Wellstone’s own Minnesota, where legislators are contemplating a constitutional amendment to require voter ID, and in South Carolina, which may severely restrict voter registration drives by burdening them with unnecessary restrictions and fines. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 10:50 am
In South Carolina, as required by Rule 402(h)(3), SCACR, every lawyer participates in a “swearing in” ceremony, during which they recite the following oath: The Lawyer’s Oath I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that: I am duly qualified, according to the Constitution of this State, to exercise the duties of the office to which I have been appointed, and that I will, to the best of my ability, discharge those duties and will preserve, protect, and defend the… [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:52 am
Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. [read post]
