Search for: "United Development Funding, L.P."
Results 41 - 60
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Background In July 2008, Hurricane Dolly caused extensive damage to a luxury condominium project that Sapphire V.P., L.P. was in the process of developing on South Padre Island. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Background In July 2008, Hurricane Dolly caused extensive damage to a luxury condominium project that Sapphire V.P., L.P. was in the process of developing on South Padre Island. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
By Dan Nabel This year, fair use law experienced mostly positive developments. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
Crow Capital Securities, L.P. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 8:45 am
Waveland North Paradigm III – B Partners GMI-ES 14 LP United Development Funding III Frontier Masters Series 1 KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT United Develop Fund Land Op LP Frontier Diversified Series 1 ArctTerra REIT Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:18 am
In Houston Refining, L.P. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:26 am
These alternative investments included: • 8/11/06 ARCITERRA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. $50,000.00 • 8/11/06 CYPRESS EQUIPMENT FUND XII, LLC $50,000.00 • 10/4/06 AMREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH M, LTD. $75,000.00 • 10/4/06 ICONLEASING FUND ELEVEN, LLC $50,000.00 • 11/9/06 LAEROC EDGE FUND, L.P. $62,500.00 • 11/10/06 ODYSSEY OPERATING PARTNERSHIP II, LTD. $67,000.00 • 11/28/06 CNL INCOME, 2ND OFFERING $70,000.00 •… [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
F/K/A PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION D/B/A PEDECO, INC., WARREN RESOURCES, INC., AND OIL TECHNOLOGY FUND 1996 - SERIES D, L.P., No. 12-0452 Opinion of the Court The Court applied its reasoning from Fortis Benefits v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
The case involves a dispute between sophisticated real estate investment funds over the proceeds from the development and sale of commercial condominiums at 40 Broad Street in lower Manhattan owned by a Delaware LLC in which the plaintiff and defendant held 5% and 95% membership interests, respectively. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:27 pm
City of Palo Alto, as a condition of approving a 96 unit condominium development, the City required the developer to set aside 10 condominium units as below-market-rate housing and make a substantial in-lieu cash payment to a City fund. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The court found that there were a number of distinguishing facts from Save Tara, which reflected careful actions by the Mayor’s Office as it provided funds. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:38 am
Samson Lone Star, L.P., on appeal from the First District Court of Appeals in Houston. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:30 am
TYCO VALVES & CONTROLS, L.P. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:25 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm
PALMS WEST HOSPITAL, L.P., ALBERTO MARANTE, M.D., SUDHIRA KULATUNGA, M.D., and FLORIDA PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE, P.A., Appellees. 4th District.Criminal law -- Post conviction relief -- No merit to claim that trial court could not impose upward departure sentence on different grounds after habitual offender sentence was stricken -- Substitute judge who conducted resentencing complied with applicable procedural rule? [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
Examiners reservation, a federal court -- circumventing San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:00 am
Goldman & Co., L.P. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:24 pm
The amendment, along with many others, is being proposed to S.1813, the transportation funding reauthorization bill, Moving Ahead for Progress for the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) [See WIMS 3/8/12]. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
Schwind, Esq.* Background A summary of the lengthy and complex factual background in this case begins with the original reclassification of 1,060 acres on the Big Island "agricultural" to "urban" use in 1989, subject to the condition that the original owner develop 60 percent of the proposed 2,760 housing units as "affordable" units. [read post]
