Search for: "United Recovery Systems, LP"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Univision Network LP/Sentry Claims Service, 184 So. 3d 653 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). $1,562.15 formula fee for 128.9 of legal work = $12.12 an hour. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Univision Network LP/Sentry Claims Service, 184 So. 3d 653 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). $1,562.15 formula fee for 128.9 of legal work = $12.12 an hour. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:45 am
Among the fund assets were Nigerian payment adjusted warrants and Uruguayan value recovery rights. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm
A news release from the Environmental Protection Agency says NuStar Pipeline Operating Partnership LP, of San Antonio, also agreed to spend $768,000 to install tank monitoring and alarm systems at several of its facilities. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
FEE-SHIFTING BY BENCH AND BAR IN TEXAS HENCEFORTH TO BE GUIDED BY THE LODESTAR Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm
LP agreed to the amount in a proposed consent decree filed in Tulsa federal court late Tuesday. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
The proximate cause theory, on the other hand, recognizes that restricting ‘direct loss’ to preclude recovery for any third-party obligations ‘would seem to conflict with the plain and ordinary meaning of a direct loss. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
If the public doesn’t think the system is fair, at a minimum, they are not going to invest their hard-earned money. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
To date, there has been a significant mismatch between the Supreme Court’s docket and the pervasiveness of Rule 23 cases in the federal system. [read post]
