Search for: "United States Army Corps of Engineers"
Results 81 - 100
of 915
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2021, 7:43 pm
Army Corps of Engineers proposed the third new definition of "waters of the United States" in the past six years. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 9:35 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.) are here. [read post]
9 May 2019, 12:46 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): SRST v USACOE [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 7:24 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.). [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 8:35 am
Army Corps of Engineers et al, (D.D.C. 16-cv-01534): 258- United States Army Corps of Engineers’ Brief Regarding Remedy 259- Motion of the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, the American Petroleum Institute, the Association of Oil Pipe Lines, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and the National Association of Manufacturers for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief in Support… [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:27 am
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) have released a pre-publication copy of a Final Rule that was proposed on November 22, 2017 and which will soon be published in the Federal Register. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 2:06 pm
The settlement resolves allegations that Caddell submitted false claims to the Army Corps of Engineers about hiring and mentoring Mountain Chief Management Services, a Native American owned company, while working on projects at Fort Bragg in North Carolina and Fort Campbell in Kentucky. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers, vacating Nationwide Permit (“NWP”) 12, a general permit issued by the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) for pipelines and other utility projects. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:20 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): 28 Enbridge Opposition 29 Army Corps Opposition 33 Reply 42 DCT Order Prior post here. [read post]
24 May 2021, 5:46 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): 569 Tribe Motion 573 Army Corps Opposition 586 Tribe Reply 607 DCT Order Prior post here. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:05 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): 292 Yankton Sioux Tribe Motion for Summary J 317-1 Army Corps Response 319 Dakota Access Response 324 Reply 341 DCT Order [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:27 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:41 am
Army Corps of Engineers (“ACOE”) issued joint draft guidance seeking to clarify which wetlands can be considered “waters of the United States” protected by the Clean Water Act (“CWA” or the “Act”). [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 2:13 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): March 7 Order Materials here. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 4:01 pm
Army Corps of Engineers expressing... [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 6:33 am
Army Corp. of Engineers (“ACE”) proposed a rule revising the definition of “waters of the United States. [read post]
12 May 2021, 10:00 pm
This is the first major offshore wind project approved by BOEM, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and the National Marine Fisheries Service: at 800 megawatts of capacity, the project is an order of magnitude larger than previously-installed test turbines and projects like the 30-megawatt Block Island Wind Farm. [read post]
12 May 2021, 10:00 pm
This is the first major offshore wind project approved by BOEM, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and the National Marine Fisheries Service: at 800 megawatts of capacity, the project is an order of magnitude larger than previously-installed test turbines and projects like the 30-megawatt Block Island Wind Farm. [read post]
12 May 2021, 10:00 pm
This is the first major offshore wind project approved by BOEM, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and the National Marine Fisheries Service: at 800 megawatts of capacity, the project is an order of magnitude larger than previously-installed test turbines and projects like the 30-megawatt Block Island Wind Farm. [read post]
