Search for: "United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Moore"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
Pix credit here DUKE. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:58 am
On Nov. 29, the justices will hear oral argument in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:13 pm
United States (22-6389) and Jackson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:18 am
United States (Monetary Damages; Subject Matter Jurisdiction) United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
The Twitter exchange between Riley and Rose is available here. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 5:56 am
In considering this trade-off, it is important to remember that the United States bears full responsibility for the unconscionable delay and continuing legal morass. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:32 am
Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am
Here is how, legally, the United States and allied governments might implement the approach I advocated with Johnson. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
The Commission consists of nine Senators, nine Members of the House of Representatives, and five senior Administration officials appointed by the President. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:05 am
Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) authority to seek in federal court actions disgorgement up to five years after the occurrence of securities laws violations, and expands that authority to ten years where those violations involve scienter-based (intentional) fraud. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
However, starting with United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
” Proposed FEC Rule Would Further Constrain Foreign Election Contributions National Public Radio – Philip Ewing | Published: 8/1/2019 The FEC proposed new rules to outlaw exchanges like the one that took place when a Russian delegation visited Trump Tower in 2016 to offer Donald Trump’s campaign “dirt” on Democrats. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Issues: (1) Whether the Federal Communications Commission’s assumption of gatekeeper power over new methods of communication, “in the most important place [] for the exchange of views[,] … the ‘vast democratic forums of the Internet,’” violates the First Amendment; (2) whether the radical reinterpretation of the Communications Act of 1934 by the FCC is entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
It no doubt explains why Spotify and China's internet giant Tencent exchanged equity stakes of just under 10 per cent of each other, and why Tencent now has a $2 billion stake in Snapchat. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
The Parkers asserted that IB's acts and omissions, involving an extreme degree of risk, were grossly negligent, IB had actual awareness of the risk involved, but proceeded with conscious indifference, and IB had violated the Texas Securities Act.[3] The Parkers claimed that IB's breaches of duty had caused them a loss of $725,779 and IB had profited $44,807 in commissions, fees, and interest. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission that through its "Attorney Network Services," it "coordinate[s] and implement[s] legal collection solutions undertaken on behalf of our clients through the management of nationwide legal resources specializing in collection litigation. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Plaintiff also seeks an additional $2,500 for post-judgment motions, $5,000 for an appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and $2,500 for an appeal to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:44 am
EJI notes that yesterday’s order list also included an order sending back Alabama death-row inmate Taurus Carroll’s case to the state court “for further review in light of the Court’s recent decision in Moore v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
On 15 February 2017, Sir Michael Tugendhat handed down judgment in the case of Bains v Moore [2017] EWHC 242 (QB). [read post]
