Search for: "United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New York"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2009, 8:53 am
City of New York. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:32 am
Tomorrow in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:20 am
After all, although they emphasized intervention during oral argument, even the City of New York and the Solicitor General argued that, because of the unique nature of the FCA, the sixty-day limit should apply when the government does not formally intervene but asserts "particular rights" or "actively participates" in the action. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court issued its decision today in United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:39 pm
City of New York, et, al.. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:48 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:29 am
City of New York, 129 S. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
City of New York, 556 U. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:11 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:45 pm
City of New York , 556 U. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:28 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 4:44 pm
Granston stressed that in declined cases, the government is a “third party” as described in United States ex rel. [read post]
