Search for: "United States of America v. Case" Results 1 - 20 of 7,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On 15-16 July the Supreme Court heard the case of United States of America v Nolan regarding the respondent’s redundancy following the closure of her US military base, RSA Hythe. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:28 am
 Edwards v Government of the United States of America [2007] EWHC 1877 (Admin) “In deciding whether there was dual criminality under the Extradition Act 2003, the domestic court was confined to the facts alleged in the offence specified in the extradition request. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 59; [2008] WLR (D) 266 “A foreign prosecuting authority's plea bargain offer to an accused person whose extradition was sought, did not constitute an abuse of process unless the predicted consequences of refusing the offer were so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:50 am by sally
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) [2009] UKSC 9; [2010] WLR (D) 52 “It was only if some quite exceptionally compelling feature, or combination of features, was present that interference with the right to family life under art 8(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms consequent upon extradition would be other than proportionate to the objective that extradition served. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:58 am by sally
Salazar-Duarte v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 3150 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 313 “For the purposes of s 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003, the person whose extradition was sought was deemed to be informed of the extradition order against him when the solicitors acting on his behalf received a letter, whether by post, fax or e-mail, which informed him that the order had been made. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:42 pm by Mark Murakami
  The case is United States of America v. $22,050.00 United States Currency and can be found here. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:37 pm by Shannon O'Hare
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA On 20 December 2020 Congress approved the “second-largest economic relief package in US history” of USD 900bn (the first tracking back to the beginning of the pandemic in March, securing USD 2.2tn). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Charles (Government of the United States of America - Air Force) has posted Recentering Foreign Affairs Preemption in Arizona v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 2:14 pm by Chris Castle
These preinstallation agreements cover almost all Android devices sold in the United States.United States of America, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, South Carolina and Texas v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:57 am by PJ Blount
Paragraph 4 is amended to read as follows: “Recognizing the application of the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Poland on the Status of the Armed Forces of the United States of America in the Territory of the Republic of Poland, done at Warsaw on December 11, 2009 (hereafter referred to as the “U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:40 pm
"Sealed Appellee" a/k/a United States of America, the prosecution in a federal criminal case: The U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
United States opinion in the United States Court of Claims, a wilful FBAR Penalty case. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:57 am
There are two cases for argument in the United States Supreme Court's October Term that may be of interest to creditors- Ransom v. [read post]