Search for: "United States of America v. Crawford"
Results 21 - 40
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2015, 1:30 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 10:23 am
DotD points to Casey v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 9:28 am
Remini, Robert V. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:32 am
" See United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am
United States, in which the court affirmed a lower-court judgment holding that Congress properly delegated authority in the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act to the U.S. attorney general to apply the law’s registration requirements, suggests that “[t]he more conservative justices, aligned with the dissent, favor disciplining the administrative state but not the national security president. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
The only decisions you have a chance of appealing up are those that deal with United States Constitution issues. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
It was said by the President of the United States, but at a private meeting, where I presume he, like many Presidents before him say "fuck" and other bad words all the time. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers - 3/23/15. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am
“I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
United States, 272 U.S. 52, 110–39 (1926) (executive power); INS v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
The freedom of association protects an organization's right to refuse to allow someone to speak on its behalf, as the Court held in Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:10 pm
[6] Crawford et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
PennsylvaniaDocket: 09-1396Issue(s): Whether a child's statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial” evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
MillerDocket: 10-851Issue(s): (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in concluding that "established law" for purposes of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) is based on the law in effect when the state conviction becomes final; and (2) even if reviewed de novo, did the Sixth Circuit err in concluding that the suicide note here was "testimonial" under principles explained in Crawford v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
All very interesting, of course, but let’s get back to my original point: according to my research, this case is the first one, ever, in which any court in the United States of America has used the phrase “sexy cop” in a written judicial opinion. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:33 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al.Amicus brief of New England Legal FoundationAmicus brief of Alliance of Automobile Manufcturers, Inc. et al. [read post]
30 May 2009, 11:24 pm
The Case of CMS v. [read post]
