Search for: "United States of America v. D&L Sales, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
After the plaintiff staged the defendants’ home by installing rental furniture, antiques, art, and home décor for the purpose of enhancing its appearance and, thereby, its prospects for sale, the defendants defaulted on their contractual payment obligations to the plaintiff. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
L. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:47 am
Mondelēz International, Inc. manufactures and distributes those products by its various family members.Ominously for Retrobrands’ petition, the Board started its discussion by stating that, “CHICLETS branded gum has been sold in the United States continuously by various predecessors-in-interest since around 1900. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:09 am
Océ North America, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
L. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:06 am
§1332(d). [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
D. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:09 pm
[United Jersey Bank v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
Kay Grose, d/b/a America's Affordable Housing J & K Mfg. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 11:25 am
SAS Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Bain, Wiley, Rein & Fielding, Washington, D.C., for amici Ad Hoc Copyright Coalition; Commercial Internet Exchange; Computer & Communications Industry Association; Information Technology Association of America; Netcoalition.com; United States Internet Industry Association, and United States Telecommunications Association. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
RACHEL L. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(b) through (d) include four exceptions to these novelty parts. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
L. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Bugay & Craig L. [read post]
