Search for: "United States of America v. Davis Jr." Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Davis    Eastern District of Tennessee at KnoxvilleCRIMINAL 08a0056p.06 Mickey v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 59. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
   A decision  by the Court last year, clearing the way for unlimited spending by corporations in federal elections (Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
  Potential Blanket Legal Barriers Here is the text of Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any S [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But, as Saul Cornell and Gerry Leonard have recently argued, America prior to the War never escaped the overall description of a “herrenvolk democracy. [read post]
11 May 2017, 2:30 am by Jon Katz
Lee Highway (Route 29) and Jefferson-Davis Highway (Route 1) starting in Arlington; the annual Lee-Jackson Day that precedes Martin Luther King, Jr., Day, and closes state offices and courts; and the many Virginians who proudly fly the Confederate flag at their homes, sell the flags at their shops, and attach them to their vehicles. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]