Search for: "United States of America v. Duke" Results 41 - 60 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Adam Schlossman
United States (10-5443) and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 3:50 pm by Kent Scheidegger
-Mexico border and banning Muslims from the United States -- or, at the very least, aggressively vetting Muslims seeking entry to the country. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:20 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Even more guidance can be found in the Goodson Law Library's collection of legislative drafting resources, which can be searched in the Duke Libraries Catalog with the subject heading "Bill drafting – United States". [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:18 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Additional titles of interest in Duke's collection include You May Not Tie an Alligator to a Fire Hydrant: 101 Real Dumb Laws (K184 .K66 2002) and the 2016 e-book America's Oddest Laws. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm by Adrian Lurssen
See: Patent Reform 2011: 'America Invents Act' Passes House and Senate for more information...- Wal-Mart v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:15 am by tom
UNITED STATES Wednesday, March 30, 2011 09-1039    ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am by Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter
Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States §962, p. 434 (1833) (“the taxing power is often, very often, applied for other purposes, than revenue”). [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
It includes not only active participants in hostilities but also anyone who "purposefully and materially" supported attacks on the United States or its allies -- language that arguably encompasses anyone who sent money to a banned group or food to a combatant son. [read post]